Let's follow on this post here about more intriguing geomorphology (land forms underpinned by geology), with a little help from AI in the first instance.
Hungary
LinkedIn @markku-ylisirniö posted here a cool map of Hungary:
![]() |
| screen grab from original post, click to enlarge |
I commented on his post:
This is fascinating! I wonder what those striations / lineaments are in the W part of the country? Glacial followed by river erosion along the edge of Quaternary ice sheets, or structural features from underlying strata (tho I don't recall any mountain-building nearby). Must look up geomorphology & geology. Thx!
My late Hungarian geologist dad could have answered this RIP. He had a relief map in my bro's old room I'm currently using (long story):
![]() |
| author photo, click to enlarge |
Hence my answer to my comment on LinkedIn:
The geological map shows strata lying EW, so those are likely geomorphology as in glacial or fluvial erosion, to be continued...
So I ask Perplexity AI (prompt in AI-speak):
reason for geomorphology NS striations in West of green topo map, when geology formations in coloured map run EW
And it obligingly answers before I can blink here, and summarized it:
The north–south stripes on the western topographic map reflect young erosional and structural lineaments—valleys, ridges, and scarps—controlled by neotectonic faults and drainage patterns. In contrast, the coloured geological map shows older, predominantly east–west–trending stratigraphy inherited from the Alpine–Carpathian structural grain.
In Transdanubia, much of the relief is carved into Neogene–Quaternary sediments whose incision does not necessarily follow the strike of the underlying bedrock. Numerous ENE–WSW and NNW–SSE faults have tilted blocks and guided valley orientations, producing the meridional valleys and parallel ridges characteristic of the western Transdanubian Hills.
Rivers and tributaries commonly align with these active or reactivated faults, reinforcing north–south to NNE–SSW drainage. Over time, fluvial incision along these structural lines creates elongated valleys that appear as N–S striations in shaded relief.
Thus, the mismatch between the two maps arises because the geological map highlights older lithostratigraphic boundaries, while the topography expresses younger fault‑controlled and erosion‑driven geomorphology.
Great Lakes
![]() |
| screen grab from original video, click to enlarge |
Having found no cross-border GIS data, I overlaid them graphically (they were in similar projections)... In fact that's what launched me into GIS exactly 40 yrs. ago (2nd paragraph here): the geophysics of the Manitoulin Island Discontinuity from Ontario to Wisconsin wasn't traceable for lack cross-border mappable geodata; paper maps didn't match & digital data weren't available then.
![]() |
| QGIS map by author, click to enlarge |
Note that the latter includes the Iron Ranges, not only of mining importance opening this section, but also the start of life as we know it per edX MITx on early Paleobiology here.
Another intriguing wrinkle: enlarge the map and see the EW lineament left of the word Mazatzal Terrane at lower right; that may reflect the Manitoulin Island Dicontinuity referred to earlier here.
... Same as Bay of Biscay canyons explained here, no AI is needed to sort this one out!
from original post, click to enlarge




