- let's focus on meeting users needs, regardless of the underlying technology (say, must we know how ABS brakes work to drive a car) - users want to perform their jobs better, not play with new toys
- but if current user needs are a starting point, then let not their needs be a limit either (a car manufacturer once thought that the automobile market was limited by the availability of chauffeurs)
- let's focus on interoperability, as we never find homogeus systems in any complete workflow (how often do data retrieval, geospatial processing and intra/internet posting happen via a single source?)
- and data or process standards greatly enhance the success of interoperability, say, as comprehensive data models (schemas) such as PPDM, or as data exchange protocols (XML) such as Energistics
- also documenting the data and processes via detailed metadata every step of the way will facilitate both of the above (those notes in fact encapsulate all the unstructured knowledge of how a system works)
My web presence
1986 |
select poetry | buy poetry | my year in kuwait || shutterfly | flickr! | slideshare | youtube || pers. & prof. portfolios | pers. & prof. channels
Saturday, 22 August 2009
Standards & Metadata - Part V
A quick follow-on to my series of same name posted here - I had a long email trail with a potential partner about serving up petrodata on the web, and here are a few lessons learned:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please send me a copy of your prospectus to